[LCC] [W1AW/5 LA] Planning for LCC fun in 2015

[Steve Lott]

I do like this...........

We could do a fixed number of N5LCC/# during the running of the LCC, and a
QSO with a single N5LCC/# station gets 100 points bonus, but a sweep of QSOs
with all the N5LCC/# stations gets a times 10 bonus or something else, like
an additional multiplier(s)?  For the purposes of the contest, we could
randomly assign the /#, and do it kind of like WRTC, that no one knows which
op has which call.  Then for log checking and scoring, we could go back to
the original call.  For example, operate as N5LCC/8 = W5WZ, & N5LCC/0 =
KG5VK.  The in-state results would list N5LCC/8 (@W5WZ), etc.

Just the /parish stuff is an issue
The way WRTC does it is they get a block of calls issued by the FCC
not sure we want to try that route :)
But maybe the /# would work, not sure
n5Lcc/8  and N5LCC/9  on the same band might be confusing as all hell and
questionable use of a callsign ????

steve


http://www.KG5VK.com
My Ham Radio Friends


On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Steve Lott <lottsphoto at gmail.com> wrote:

> or instead of re-inventing the wheel
> and maybe just encourage all of us (esp me as I need the encouragement)
> to participate in more contest during the year..............
>
> we embrace what another "young" club has done successfully
>
> The Arizona Outlaws DX club has this Ladder competition
>
> http://www.arizonaoutlaws.net/ladder.html
>
> we could of course tailor it
>
> I like how it is based on WRTC qualification rules
>
> I did not have time to get into the read of all the details,  and we as a
> group need to discus them
> looking for both Pro's and Con's on this
>
> what about embracing the N5LCC idea with use of slots in the on line
> schedule during LAQP  and doing the Arizona Outlaw ladder as well ?
>
> The new year will be here soon
> lets at least do something ???
>
> come on guys tell us what YOU are thinking !!!
>
> steve
>
>
>
> http://www.KG5VK.com
> My Ham Radio Friends
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Steve Lott <lottsphoto at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I like the spirit of this conversation.............
>>
>> But was thinking that maybe there might be issue with N5LCC/Boss  etc
>> as that is an illegal callsign
>>
>> So I asked my high school buddy Ward for some input..........
>>
>> His reply follows.........
>>
>> I assume you mean FCC rules...you are right that self-assigned
>> identifiers must not conflict with the prefixes assigned to any other
>> countries.  You're not even supposed to sign /M.  That's one of the reasons
>> why Techs who upgraded to Tech Plus had to sign /KT and not /T or something
>> similar - KT is a US prefix.
>>
>> In the MO QSO Party, the county (parish) is obviously part of the
>> exchange (just as section is in Sweepstakes) and that has proven to be
>> sufficiently attractive to the callers.  So I suggest just using N5LCC and
>> adding any differentiating information in the QSO exchange.
>>
>> That said, the call's trustee is responsible for knowing the control
>> operator responsible for any transmission so you'll have to maintain pretty
>> good scheduling!
>>
>> 73, Ward N0AX
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Really, this is me brainstorming via the fingertips.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What if we allowed members of the LCC to operate with the N5LCC call
>>> during
>>> the year, and then somehow incorporated the resulting QSOs into the LAQP
>>> as
>>> bonuses, even thought these QSOs did not take place during the contest
>>> period?  I am thinking that we could do N5LCC/<parish abbreviation>.  We
>>> could even do a "worked N5LCC in all parishes" award.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> OR
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We could do a fixed number of N5LCC/# during the running of the LCC, and
>>> a
>>> QSO with a single N5LCC/# station gets 100 points bonus, but a sweep of
>>> QSOs
>>> with all the N5LCC/# stations gets a times 10 bonus or something else,
>>> like
>>> an additional multiplier(s)?  For the purposes of the contest, we could
>>> randomly assign the /#, and do it kind of like WRTC, that no one knows
>>> which
>>> op has which call.  Then for log checking and scoring, we could go back
>>> to
>>> the original call.  For example, operate as N5LCC/8 = W5WZ, & N5LCC/0 =
>>> KG5VK.  The in-state results would list N5LCC/8 (@W5WZ), etc.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> OR
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Does anyone think it would be possible to put 16 parishes on the air
>>> simultaneously, and do it 4 times during the year (16 different parishes
>>> each time), so that in the 4 events all 64 parishes have been activated?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Okay, fingers tired now.  Now you other guys let the creative juices flow
>>> and put in your 2 cents worth!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --Scott, W5WZ
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> I seem to recall The Arizona Outlaws Contest club built something that
>> works for them
>>
>> But since the W1AW/5 spreadsheet allowed the coordinators to control who
>> was using N5LCC when and where
>> we could do the N5LCC without using Interim suffix identifiers
>> (N5LCC/Boss etc).
>>
>> during LAQP   or embrace some of the other ideas
>>
>> so lets hear more input from fellow members of LCC !
>>
>>
>> steve
>> KG5VK
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.louisianacontestclub.org/pipermail/lcc_louisianacontestclub.org/attachments/20141205/d7e2a354/attachment.html>