<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:black;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>How well did your previously dipole work? If you liked it, go back with another one. I love my 80M inverted vee. The apex is only 50’ but it gets out very well. The biggest problem with 80, for me is receive. If I can hear someone, I can usually work them, DX or not. So I bought a Pixel receiving loop from Ted, KN5O, and I have it atop my 55’ tower with a rotor after taking my damaged SteppIR off that tower. This morning I could not copy the 3D2 on 80 CW on the inverted vee, but I could copy him on the loop.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>The other night, I was working 80M JT-65 and was monitoring the reverse beacon network and my 30 watt signal was being decoded in Russia on a consistent basis. The thing about an inverted vee is that it is not directional whereas a dipole is. Of course, living here in the south, you can run a dipole east and west and cover just about every populated area in the world. Big advantage for us.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>As far as verticals are concerned, I don’t have any experience with them other than an HF2 I installed one time ground-mounted with a bunch of radials. It was great on long distance DX like to EU, but not good to stateside as compared to my inverted vee. I had both antennas installed at the same time.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>73, Don AA5AU<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> lcc-bounces@louisianacontestclub.org [mailto:lcc-bounces@louisianacontestclub.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Mark, K5ER<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 26, 2012 4:54 PM<br><b>To:</b> lcc@louisianacontestclub.org<br><b>Subject:</b> [LCC] 80 meter antenna recommendations?<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Okay, now its my turn to ask the group. HFTA doesn't model these combinations, and I'm not good enough with EZNEC to trust I get them built right within that software. I plan to review info from the antenna book, as well as Low Band DXing, but there is collectively A LOT of knowledge within this club, so I'd like to tap into that, too. <br><br>I need to replace my 80 meter antenna, and am considering three options:<br>#1. go back up with a flat top dipole (actually, center always seems slightly below ends) height abt 55 feet<br>#2. replace with inverted vee - feedpoint can be about 75-80 feet<br>#3. ground mounted vertical - feed point at 6" above ground, one #12 thhn conductor running up in an oak tree, one ground rod and (maybe) only one radial.*<br><br> *The #3 antenna started out from the NCJ article last year "an easy inverted-L for 160. They showed with only ONE radial, it should give close to a 50 ohm match, not needing a tuner or inductor/capacitor tuning at base. Since there are FAR more contacts on 80, as compared to 160, I could convert this inv-L to a vertical by simply cutting off the excess (leave it about 67' long). My issue here is I buried hardline from shack to feedpoint (about 260 feet), but did not realize I had used 75 ohm hardline for the last 120 feet of the run. I may have a mis-match to deal with at the feedpoint, so I would need to address that. On the radial issue, I only have abt 30 feet of yard in one direction, and the septic field lines are in the other, so a complete set of radials is out of the question. I might be able to get 4-8, MAX, but only if my wife goes somewhere for a weekend this winter and I get them stapled in without getting caught.<br><br>Everything I have seen on other reflectors compares flat tops and inv-vee's at the same height. I have read that a inv-vee is better for DX, but also read that <i><u>at the same height</u></i> an inv-vee is 1/2 to 1 db <i><u>down </u></i>from a flat-top. Because of tree location, in my case, the inv-vee feedpoint would be higher, (20-25') than I could get a flat-top.<br><br>My standard reply when someone ask me about antenna is "who do you want to talk to?" Although I enjoy SWEEPS, I haven't worked it from home is several years. I do not regularly participate in 80 meter traffic nets, (though it would be nice to be able to check in during emergency situation). I DO like the NAQP contests in January and July. I have recently become more interested in DX, and should have 4 band DXCC within a month or two, but I am only 1/2 way there on 80, so I guess my primary focus will be DX, but without giving up "some" domestic. There is a chance I could get away with EITHER #1 or #2, and still do #3 as well.<br><br>What would YOU put up, and why?<br><br>Thanks and 73,<br>Mark, K5ER<o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>