<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.5pt;
font-family:Consolas;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.PlainTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Plain Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text";
font-family:Consolas;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal>For those who don’t receive the ARRL letter:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText>==> FCC TO UTILITIES: DON'T LOOK TO HAMS TO PAY FOR
YOUR TESTING <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText>In a case that goes back more than 10 years, the FCC has
told a Pennsylvania utility that the utility is responsible for paying for
"efforts to locate and correct instances of [power line] noise"<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText><<a
href="http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Duque09_08_07_5108.pdf">http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Duque09_08_07_5108.pdf</a>>.
At least one amateur has been complaining to the FCC since 2000 regarding
harmful radio interference possibly caused by power line equipment maintained
by Pittsburgh's Duquesne Light Company (DLC) <<a
href="http://www.duquesnelight.com/">http://www.duquesnelight.com/</a>>.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText>Bob Thacker, K3GT, of Allison Park, Pennsylvania -- a
suburb just northeast of Pittsburgh -- first noticed harmful interference back
in 1996. He told the ARRL that DLC would come out and fix things, but that he
would soon hear noise again. After a few years of this, he complained to the
FCC, and in 2005, the FCC notified DLC of the complaint. A month later, DLC
responded to the FCC, detailing their efforts to resolve the matter and
indicated that the most recent complaint was the result of changed conditions,
not the continuation of an old problem.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText>According to the FCC, DLC again communicated with the FCC
in a letter dated June 2, 2005, explaining the efforts they had taken to repair
three lightning arrestors. During the latter half of 2005 and into 2006,
Thacker continued to experience interference and continued to report these
instances to DLC, requesting that DLC correct the problems. In 2007, he located
a specific pole as one source of noise and advised a Mr Luther of DLC of this
fact; Mr Luther advised Thacker that he would submit a work order.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText>In March 2008, DLC contacted Thacker, indicating that it
had swept the area where the suspected pole was located and discovered no
noise. DLC indicated that the noise source was a neon light. Finally, DLC
stated that it had spent "significant amounts of time and money" attempting
to address his concerns and that DLC would require him to pay for any
additional efforts to locate and correct instances of noise.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText>Special Counsel for Amateur Enforcement Laura Smith
responded to DLC in July of this year, saying "Such a response is not
acceptable." She spelled out what she called "the most important
rules relating to radio and television interference from incidental
radiators," specifically:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText>47 CFR, Section 15.5: General Conditions of Operation
<<a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2002/octqtr/pdf/47cfr15.5.pdf">http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2002/octqtr/pdf/47cfr15.5.pdf</a>>;
47 CFR, Section 15.13: Incidental Radiators <<a
href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2002/octqtr/pdf/47cfr15.13.pdf">http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2002/octqtr/pdf/47cfr15.13.pdf</a>>,
and<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText>47 CFR Section 15.15: General Technical Requirements <<a
href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2002/octqtr/pdf/47cfr15.15.pdf">http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2002/octqtr/pdf/47cfr15.15.pdf</a>>.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText>"Given the fact this case has been ongoing for quite
some time without resolution and DLC has had ample time to locate the instances
of interference and make the necessary repairs," Smith told the utility,
"you are directed to respond to [me] within 60 days of receipt of this
letter, detailing what steps you have taken to resolve the remaining instances
of interference that are reported as being caused by your equipment. Should the
remaining interference problems not be resolved within those 60 days, DLC will
be required to provide [me] with a status update every two weeks going forward
as to what progress, if any, has been made to resolve the matter."<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText>ARRL Lab Engineer and power line noise expert Mike
Gruber, W1MG, was pleased with Smith's decision, and said that amateurs should
not be made to pay fees to the utilities to test for harmful interference by
the same utilities. "It is not the responsibility of an Amateur Radio
operator to track down and get rid of power line noise -- that's the utilities'
job. I am pleased with the precedent that Laura Smith and the FCC have set
here. Now maybe more utilities will take power line noise interference more
seriously in the future."<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>