[LCC] How to Make a Contest QSO

K1DW at aol.com K1DW at aol.com
Fri Jul 22 00:04:11 EDT 2011


A great write up which every contester should read...  also that is  part 
of the The ARRL Contest Update that Ward Silver puts out once a  month....  
it is available for the asking by ARRL members... If not a  member of the 
ARRL and a contester, his monthly Update is work the price of  membership...  
fortunately I am a lifer.
 
have fun and good luck in the contest of life...  73 BCNU de   Dallas... 
k1DW
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 7/20/2011 4:48:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
w5wz at w5wz.com writes:

 
CONVERSATION 
How To Have A (Contest) Conversation   
After the last issue was emailed to readers, I  received a most reasonable 
request. "This issue shows how NOT to make a Field  Day QSO. How SHOULD I 
make a Field Day QSO?" Here is a good example of how  experienced operators 
(i.e. - your editor) can forget that criticism without  instruction is not 
helpful. One has to demonstrate the right technique so as  to illustrate why 
the wrong technique is, in fact, wrong! So here goes...       
 
Here's somebody having fun learning the right  way to make Field Day QSOs! 
That's Scotty Wright, son of KØMD at the  controls of WØSAA (Photo by  KØMD) 
First, a disclaimer. There is no One Perfect Method  for efficient, 
effective contest operating. The "right" technique depends on  band conditions, how 
many are (or aren't) calling, the intensity of the  competition, and the 
skill of the operators on each end. What follows are  guidelines and I am 
assuming that the contest is a phone contest. The reader  should be able to 
apply the same principles to CW and digital contest  operation.  
To make a lot of QSOs in a fixed period - the goal of  nearly every contest 
- you need to minimize the time you spend making each  QSO. The first step 
in minimizing the duration of a QSO is to remove all  unnecessary verbiage. 
In a perfect world, the only thing you should hear going  back and forth 
during a contest is call signs and exchange information. It  should sound like 
this:  
1 - CQ Field Day KOØA  
2 - [pileup]  
3 - W1ABC 2 Alpha Missouri  
4 - 1 Alpha Eastern Massachusetts  
5 - Thanks KOØA  
Not a wasted bit of transmitting exists in that  exchange. Lines 1 and 5 
are "bookends" in which KOØA identifies and solicits  QSOs. (This style of 
operation is sufficient for W1ABC, as well.) This is the  standard to which you 
should aspire on either end of the QSO. In Line 3, KOØA  has pulled out a 
full call sign from the pileup, sent it to notify everyone  who the QSO is 
with, given the information in the expected order and stopped  transmitting. 
KOØA does not say, "Please copy..." or "You are..." or repeat  any 
information or say, "Over" or "Go ahead" or any number of other things  that take up 
time but don't add anything to the flow of the contact. In Line  4, W1ABC 
responds when called, gives the contest information, and stops  transmitting. 
That's it - no extra "stuff" to slow things down. In Line 5,  KOØA 
acknowledges that the information was complete and the call sign ends the  
transmission. No "QRZed" or "CQ Field Day" or "from" is required. If no  stations call, 
then a longer CQ transmission starts the cycle again. (A nit to  
pick...when a station says "You are" and then describes their own  configuration, 
shouldn't that really be "I am"?)  
When should you deviate from this ideal? There are  lots of reasons to do 
so. In Line 3, KOØA should not give out any exchange  information until sure 
of enough of the caller's call sign that only one  station is likely to 
respond. For example, if KOØA doesn't get the last letter  of W1ABC's 
call..."W1AB-something 2 Alpha Missouri, what's the last letter?"  W1ABC should 
respond with something like, "W1 Alpha Bravo Charlie, last letter  is Charlie, 1 
Alpha...etc" Why does W1ABC repeat the full call? To confirm  that the 
missing letter is the last one and that the call is not W1CAB or just  W1AB. 
Similarly, if KOØA has W1ABC's call wrong, W1ABC might simply respond  with, 
"W1ABC". At that point, KOØA can resume with Line 3 shown above.   
What about repeating your information? If not  requested to do so, don't! 9 
times out of 10, even a QRP station will be  perfectly readable in Line 4 
above. The other callers are standing by  (hopefully) so KOØA is probably 
going to get the information on the first  transmission - don't waste time with 
unrequested repeats! If a repeat is  requested, repeat only the information 
requested.   
Should W1ABC give KOØA's call sign in Line 4? Whenever  there is any 
question about the intended receiving station give the call sign.  It is very 
common under crowded contest conditions for two stations to be  extremely close 
together or even on the same frequency if they are in each  other's skip 
zones or have antenna nulls aimed at each other. When this  happens, don't 
depend on timing - give the other station's call sign before  sending your own 
information. If you don't, you take a chance that the "wrong"  station will 
log you. The extra information often saves losing a contact (and  the 
multiplier and the possible penalty).  
What if W1ABC misses some of KOØA's information? Then  W1ABC should request 
a repeat ("What is your section?") BEFORE proceeding with  "1 Alpha Eastern 
Massachusetts." W1ABC should not transmit  any exchange information until 
all of KOØA's information has been received. If  W1ABC waits until after 
sending the category and section to ask for a repeat,  KOØA will likely assume 
W1ABC received the information OK and will proceed  with Line 5 too soon. 
This gets everything out of sync for everybody,  including any callers waiting 
to contact KOØA. Yes, W1ABC could wait until  KOØA's next contact to copy 
the information but I can tell you from personal  experience - it doesn't 
always work out that way! Get the information you need  during the contact and 
don't assume you can get it on subsequent contacts -  that's a big waste of 
time for you.  
Obviously, there are many more variations on the basic  theme. By 
practicing, you'll learn the basic principles of snappy, crisp  operating. To learn 
more about effective, efficient operating, listen to the  top operators on 
the air while they are "running" and try to emulate them.   
    *   Learn to pull a full call sign out of a pileup  whenever you can  
    *   Give your full  call whenever calling in a pileup  
    *   Transmit exchange information the same way every  time  
    *   Eliminate wasted syllables and words   
    *   Speak clearly without rushing or mumbling   
    *   Speech audio should be non-distorted and free of  background noise 
The top operators are flexible, too. When conditions  require it, they will 
"change gears" to a faster or slower technique in order  to maintain the 
flow of information and keep the contacts coming. Just like a  long-distance 
runner who only lifts each foot enough to clear the ground, the  top 
operators only transmit enough information to keep making contacts. You  might not 
think the difference between "Thanks" and "Thank you" is worth much,  but if 
in a 48-hour contest the goal is upwards of 5000 contacts, saying the  extra 
"you" 5000 times is significant. This may be "cutting the tags off the  
teabags" as the backpackers say but work on eliminating non-essential  
transmissions and see if your log doesn't fill up a little quicker!   
Should this be the style of operating for casual,  non-contest contacts? Of 
course not! But it would be completely appropriate  for a net control 
station trying to run an emcomm net with many calling to  check in, pass traffic, 
report status, etc. When trying to handle that load  "extra stuff" can 
really gum up the works. The habits and skills formed under  contest conditions 
help make you an effective operator when the chips are  really down - in a 
disaster or  emergency situation when every minute counts.  
73, Ward NØAX 



_______________________________________________
LCC  mailing  list
LCC at louisianacontestclub.org
http://mail.louisianacontestclub.org/mailman/listinfo/lcc_louisianacontestcl
ub.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.louisianacontestclub.org/pipermail/lcc_louisianacontestclub.org/attachments/20110722/8dd5eca5/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 15570 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.louisianacontestclub.org/pipermail/lcc_louisianacontestclub.org/attachments/20110722/8dd5eca5/attachment-0001.jpe>


More information about the LCC mailing list